Skip to main content

Commission Website: National Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention

Read findings from the National Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention, examining conditions and treatment of children held in Australian immigration

Children and youth rights Inquiry December, 2012

This page is archived

You are in an archived section of the website. This information may not be current. This page was first created in December, 2012.

Summary

We needed more classrooms to run the classes so as to provide adequate contact time for both children and adults. To compensate for the lack of classrooms we used the messes and at times recreational rooms in the compounds. This didn’t provide nearly enough teaching venues and was really inappropriate as a teaching environment. Over the whole centre the total number of allocated classrooms (apart from the computer centres) in five compounds was five (three in the main compound, one in November compound, one in Mike compound and none in India and Oscar compounds).

Click here to return to the Submission Index

Submission to the National Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention from

Tom Mann: Supplementary Submission

To clarify a statement relating to whether there was a teacher shortage, or it was more a facilities issue, at Woomera detention centre:

We needed more classrooms to run the classes so as to provide adequate contact time for both children and adults. To compensate for the lack of classrooms we used the messes and at times recreational rooms in the compounds. This didn't provide nearly enough teaching venues and was really inappropriate as a teaching environment. Over the whole centre the total number of allocated classrooms (apart from the computer centres) in five compounds was five (three in the main compound, one in November compound, one in Mike compound and none in India and Oscar compounds). Each classroom catered for about 25 children or adults in any given session which meant that the contact time was severely reduced for more than 500 detainees. We needed at least 15 classrooms for the centre overall to facilitate an effective teaching program.

With respect to the number of teachers, ACM imposed a series of bandwidths, based on the number of detainees, for the appointment of a certain number of teachers. We needed three times the number of teachers but we would not have been able to use them effectively without increasing the number of classrooms, as explained before. We could have used more detainee assistant teachers if there were no additional teachers appointed by ACM (and if there more classrooms) but there were too many difficulties with this approach as well.

Overall, we were hamstrung in our teaching efforts, because of these factors. The teaching, in the end, was only going to be a token response to the educational needs of both adults and children, but particularly children.

If more classrooms and teachers were forthcoming then we still faced the problem for long-term detainees of a debilitating and antagonistic detention environment which crippled the detainees emotionally.

Tom Mann 17-07-02

Last Updated 30 June 2003.

You might also like

Have a question about discrimination or sexual harassment? Want to know more about human rights? Contact us if you need help.

Contact us
Subscribe to our mailing list to join a community of human rights advocates, and stay in the loop about our latest updates.