Skip to main content

Anonymous case study - External audit

Read how an external audit helped an organisation identify and address racism in workplace policies, systems, and everyday culture effectively.

Race discrimination Guide

Summary

This case study was anonymously submitted by a small community arts organisation operating in Sydney, NSW.

About our organisation

Our organisation has historically had a fairly white workforce, consisting predominantly of volunteers. In recent years, we have aimed to shift this, with a focus on showcasing underrepresented artists and creators through our work. Despite our programming and promotion of the work of these underrepresented artists and communities, we have faced challenges in building a more representative volunteer base within our organisation.

Diversity and includion conversations

In 2017, staff and management began having conversations about ‘diversity and inclusion’ within the organisation. In recent years, these conversations have shifted towards a discussion of structural racism and the organisation’s commitment to anti-racism. In 2020, it became clear that the organisation lacked the knowledge and expertise to address these issues on its own. For that reason, we approached an independent, First Nations-led education and consulting firm seeking support.

Consulting firm engagement

We engaged this consulting firm to conduct a survey and review into racism and other forms of discrimination at the organisation. The consulting firm performed a review of our policies and programming initiatives, and carried out an anonymous survey. The survey asked staff and volunteers about personal experiences of interpersonal and structural racism at the organisation, and what changes were needed.

What the research revealed

The research revealed that there is a significant difference between the experiences of white staff and volunteers, and staff and volunteers of colour at our organisation. While acknowledging that racism is not the only kind of discrimination experienced by staff and volunteers, the review demonstrated that staff and volunteers of colour have borne the brunt of structural inequities and racism throughout the organisation’s history. Working with an independent body facilitated an open and honest conversation that would not have been possible within the organisation’s own structure. It also ensured that the process was led by those with lived experience of racism and expertise in policy design and implementation.

The impact of the report

Following the report, management redoubled its commitment to addressing the issues raised and implementing changes to make our organisation a safe and supportive place for all staff and volunteers. Importantly, senior management has made a commitment to undertake the ongoing work required to dismantle structural racism and anti-Bla(c)kness. Among other things, this includes a commitment to engage staff and board members in ongoing training from a First Nations-led organisation. It also includes a review of the organisation’s grievance processes to ensure appropriate support and redress is provided for those who experience racism within the organisation.

You might also like

Case study: Bonner committee

Race discrimination
Guide
24 November 2025

Case study - Cultural and wellbeing leave

Race discrimination
Guide
24 November 2025

Case study - Cultural Inclusion Council

Race discrimination
Guide
24 November 2025

Case study - Diversity & inclusion plan

Race discrimination
Guide
24 November 2025

Case study - Me and white supremacy reading group

Race discrimination
Guide
24 November 2025

Case study - Mosaic staff network

Race discrimination
Guide
24 November 2025

Have a question about discrimination or sexual harassment? Want to know more about human rights? Contact us if you need help.

Contact us
Subscribe to our mailing list to join a community of human rights advocates, and stay in the loop about our latest updates.