Resolved complaint (295) about disability discrimination in good, services and facilities
Learn how a complaint (295) about disability discrimination in goods, services and facilities was resolved through conciliation.
Summary
- Year: 2026
- Relevant Act: Disability Discrimination Act
- Grounds: Disability aid; Disability
- Area(s): Access to premises; Goods, services and facilities
- Settlement terms:
- Apology – private
- Other
- Training - anti-discrimination/EEO training reviewed/revised
About the complaint
The complainant uses an ostomy bag. She alleged security personnel at the respondent airport initially refused her access to the disability lane, did not offer her a private room for a bomb swab scan and threatened to take away sprays for her stoma. She said the airport did not respond appropriately to her complaint about the incident.
The airport apologised to the complainant for the incident and for not receiving a timely response to her complaint. The airport advised it reviewed its internal complaint processes to improve retention of CCTV footage and response timeframes during busy periods. The airport undertook to review its existing security screening processes and training provided to staff. The airport said it would deliver further training to staff and contractors about expected service standards, and hidden disability and medical conditions.
The complaint was resolved by conciliation. In addition to steps already taken in response to the complaint, the airport undertook to incorporate the complainant’s experience into training materials.
Guidance on the use of these summaries
This is a summary of a selected complaint that has been resolved through our conciliation process. It's designed to help people better understand how complaints might be resolved and what outcomes are possible.
These summaries are for general guidance only and are not legal advice. If you need advice about your situation, you should seek independent legal support.
Please note:
- all complaints are de-identified
- complaints are resolved on a 'without admission of liability' basis
- some content may include confronting or offensive language.