Skip to main content

Doxxing and Privacy Reform

Understand how doxxing threatens privacy and human rights, with analysis of reform implications for people at risk of personal information disclosure.

Business and Human RightsHuman rights Submission by the Commission 30 October 2024

Summary

Learn more about how doxxing may impact the human rights of people subject to the release of personal information

Doxxing and Privacy Reform

Business and Human Rights, Human rights
Submission by the Commission

The Australian Human Rights Commission ( Commission ) has provided a submission to the Public Consultation on Doxxing and Privacy Reforms ( Consultation ).

Privacy reform

It is important to ensure that there is consistency between any reforms that target doxxing and the broader suite of Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) ( Privacy Act ) reforms that are currently being progressed.

However, there is no definitive timeline that has been provided for the finalisation of the proposed Privacy Act reforms. There is a risk of delaying the introduction of necessary measures to address the practice of doxxing.

The Australian Government should ensure that any reforms that target doxxing are enacted alongside the broader suite of Privacy Act reform, and not ahead of it.

Doxxing and human rights

Doxxing can result in an individual's name, home or email address, phone number, images, and contact details for family members, employers and other information being disclosed.

Doxxing may also result in the disclosure of ‘sensitive information,' which can include information or opinions about an individual's racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious beliefs, sexual orientation, and/or health. Commonly, this information is used by individuals and groups to attack, harass, and humiliate targeted individuals.

Doxxing impacts various human rights, most directly the right to privacy,12 which is a cornerstone human right. Doxxing can also violate several other rights, including the rights to equality and non-discrimination, life, security, and health, and can undermine human dignity.

Civil penalty for doxxing

Civil penalties must be proportionate to the harm incurred by individuals and organisations, including their executives. Regard may be had to the type of doxxing (i.e. deanonymizing, targeting, delegitimising) as well as the nature and severity of harm to victims of doxxing.

Legislators should also refrain from imposing unduly high thresholds for degrees of harm suffered, such as requiring proof of ‘psychiatric injury', which curtails protections for victims of doxxing who suffer other harms such as embarrassment and emotional distress. Such high thresholds can become a barrier to accessing justice.

Introducing civil penalties may provide individuals with greater recourse to remedies for harms suffered as a result of doxxing. However, the exact language and details of the proposed civil penalties would need to be further considered.

Recommendations

The Commission makes seven recommendations to the consultation. Please download the submission to read all recommendation in full.

You might also like

Impact of Disinformation on the Enjoyment and Realisation of Human Rights

Business and Human Rights, Human rights
Submission by the Commission
24 July 2025

Social media ban

Children and youth rights
Submission by the Commission
14 August 2025

Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence

Sex and gender
Submission by the Commission
24 July 2025

Guardrails for High-risk AI

Human rights
Submission by the Commission
30 October 2024

Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation Bill 2024

Legislation
Submission by the Commission
10 October 2024

Civics in Australia

Rights and Freedoms
Submission by the Commission
10 July 2024

Have a question about discrimination or sexual harassment? Want to know more about human rights? Contact us if you need help.

Contact us
Subscribe to our mailing list to join a community of human rights advocates, and stay in the loop about our latest updates.