Skip to main content

Commission Website: National Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention

Click

here to return to the Submission Index

Submission to the National

Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention from

Ms Terry Zeeher, Clinical

Psychologist


Sumission lodged by:

Terry Zeeher (Ms), Clinical Psychologist

May 9, 2002

I wish to provide background information to support the submission from

the Australian Psychological Society, based on my experience of working

as a psychologist in the Woomera Detention Centre between 28/3/02 and 13/4/02.

I agree unreservedly with the conclusions reached in the APS report which

states that the detention experience has multiple negative effects on children,

and that these effects can be expected to be extremely long lasting.

I would like to list the questions that are proposed by the APS for investigation

by the Enquiry, and provide my own responses to them, based on my personal

observations. In order to provide a background to these observation I will

provide a brief description of the working environment.

There were two psychologists and a psychiatric nurse at the Centre during

the period I was there. Of the approximately 280 detainees held at the Centre,

around 48 were considered to be at risk of self harm or suicide. This number

included approximately seven children under the age of eighteen. People

considered at risk were required to be monitored at intervals of 15 to 60

minutes by officers in the compounds. Those on 15 minute observations were

required to see one of the mental health staff daily. Because of the large

number of people on observation, the system had broken down, and it was

impossible for staff to give severely disturbed people the care they needed.

It is not an exaggeration to say that self harm and suicide attempts (attempted

hangings, overdoses of prescription medication, slashing, drinking of toxic

substances, jumping from high places) occurred every day within the Centre,

often a number of times each day, and the perpetrators included children

as young as eight years.

Q1 What steps are currently being undertaken to monitor the psychological

welfare of the children in detention? In particular, what steps are being

taken to monitor the psychological wellbeing of children arriving from war-torn

countries?

A To my knowledge children were not screened in any way to ascertain

whether they had suffered trauma prior to their arrival at the Centre. No

child came to the attention of psychologists in the Centre until symptoms

of psychological disturbance were observed by officers. This typically took

the form of some act of self harm.

Example: two [word deleted] year old boys attempted separately to

hang themselves. I assessed one of these boys. He said he would continue

to attempt to kill himself until he succeeded, or until he and his family

were given visas, and that it was better to die than to be locked up any

longer. He was sent to Woomera Hospital overnight with his father, then

returned to the compound and placed on 15 minutely observations. The father

expressed his extreme concern about his son, saying he had been a happy,

achieving child until his incarceration. Now, he said, his boy is "crazy",

and he feels quite unable to control his behaviour. The second boy who attempted

hanging was briefly placed with his uncle to attempt to ensure his safely,

then returned to his mother who felt unable to cope with his behaviour.

Because of staff limitations minimal follow up was available to these two

boys.

Q2 What qualifications and training do staff who care for children and

their families in detention centres have? What knowledge to they have of

psychological issues faced by people who have been subjected to traumatic

experiences and are suffering high degrees of anxiety, stress and uncertainty?

A Psychologists employed within the centres would have varying degrees

of experience in dealing with victims of trauma. Few would be likely to

be specialists in this area, though it is likely that most would be able

to deal with the emotional effects of trauma if they were able to spend

the requisite amount of time with each individual. At a practical level,

this was impossible during my period at Woomera. The psychologists and psychiatric

nurse went from one crisis to the next, and it was too often the case that

detainees received care after self harm or attempted suicide, rather than

receiving appropriate preventative care. Amongst the general nursing staff,

understanding of the emotional responses to trauma was variable. Where understanding

was inadequate detainees were accused of refusing to take responsibility

for themselves, of attention seeking behaviour, and of failing to take proper

care of their children when they were simply too distraught to do so.

Q3 What provisions have been made for psycho-educational assessment of

children's specific learning needs prior to their attending formal educational

programmes?

A I cannot answer this question except to say that the children spent

only half a day at school, and it seems unlikely that any assessment of

their needs would have occurred given time limitations.

Q4 What provisions have been made for the psychotherapeutic treatment

of children who are sufferein chronic and/or vicarious trauma as a result

of witnessing threatening behaviour while in detention?

A Again, because of limited resources, only children exhibiting overt

disturbed behaviour received attention. There was no systematic procedure

to otherwise identify children who had witnessed threatening behaviour.

Q5 What provisions have been made for families who have been seriously

affected by displacement to participate in family therapy?

A No family therapy is available in Woomera Detention Centre. As

a general rule, if severe conflict occurs between a husband and wife the

husband will be placed in a different compound, leaving the wife to care

for the children of the family unassisted.

Example: A woman and her [very young] daughter came to the Medical

Centre in an extremely distressed state. The woman said her husband had

become "crazy" (indeed he had recently exhibited quite bizarre

behaviour, though no psychosis was detected when he was assessed). The family

[words deleted], had recently been moved to a different compound, and the

wife also reported the child had become very disturbed because she was afraid

of the children in her new accomodation. The child was reported as screaming

and throwing herself on the ground when required to enter the compound,

was biting her fingernails and had begun bedwetting. The husband was moved

to a different compound and the wife was left to look after [the rest of

the family]. An application was made to allow the wife and [family]to move

to the community house in Woomera township, but this was refused by DIMIA

because the family's initial visa application had been refused, so the wife

was considered to be at increased risk of escape.

Q6 What critical incident debriefing procedures are in place for children

who have witnessed their parents, other family members, or social acquaintances

engaging in acts of self harm or being harmed while in detention? What psychotherapeutic

support is in place for children who themselves have been harmed or have

engaged in self harmful acts while in detention?

A There is no systematic way of ascertaining when children might

have witnessed disturbing events, as quite frequently occurs because of

the crowded conditions. Unless the child exhibits symptoms of disturbance

they receive no intervention. As described above, support to children who

have self harmed is frequently inadequate because of staff limitations.

Q7 What provisions are in place for parenting programmes that provide

support for parents of children under extremely difficult psychological

and physical circumstances?

A There are no assistance to parents in Woomera other than that provided

by friends and family.This frequently places great stress on older children

who may be required to care for younger siblings, or provide support for

an emotionally disturbed parent.

Example 1: A twelve year old girl began head-banging. She was the

eldest [words deleted], and had been required to take on the care of her

younger siblings because her mother suffered severe anxiety and associated

irritability, and had recently made several suicide attempts, including

setting fire to herself. The father of the children refused to assist with

their care.

Example 2: A thirteen year old boy attempted to hang himself. His

mother had been severely depressed for several months, and refused to leave

her bed. He said he had attempted to kill himself because his mother didn't

eat and cried all the time, he was tired of getting up in the morning and

seeing the fences and dirt. He said the family was being tortured, and it

didn't matter where he was kept, he would find a way to kill himself.

Q8 What efforts are being made to provide parents with the opportunity

to model traditional family roles for children, such as working to earn

an income, meal preparation, other household duties, etc.?

A There is no provision for families to prepare their own food. Accomodation

is usually shared by a number of familes so there is no family privacy.

Some work is available for a very few people outside the compounds. I understand

they are paid something like $1/hour. One woman told me she would like to

obtain work so she could buy chips and lollies for her children, as they

saw other children getting these things and she could not afford them.

Q9 What opportunities are in place for the assessment of safety issues

such as bullying, and sexual or physical abuse of children in detention

centres.

A There was one allegation, later shown to be unfounded, of

sexual abuse of a young girl. This was investigated. Beyond this I cannot

comment. I heard rumours of parents using excessive physical punishment

as a result of their distressed mental state, but saw no actual evidence

of this myself.

Q10 What socialization opportunities are available either within detention

centres or in the wider community for children to develop skills and independence,

engage in social activities, participate in cultural traditions, and communicate

and interact with same-age peers and adults from similar ethnic and religious

backgrounds?

A Socialization opportunities are extremely limited for the children

remaining in Woomera. Many complain of loneliness and of having lost their

friends when they obtained visas. The children leave the centre to attend

school, which is based at a now disused Catholic school. They have no contact

with the children who attend the local Woomera School. The have few opportunities

to develop skills and independence and no chance to see their parents demonstrating

these attributes. I saw no opportunity for any significant practice of cultural

traditions, and frequently the families occupying shared accomodation are

from different ethnic and religious backgrounds.

Q11 What provisions are in place to ensure the maintenance of privacy

in a manner commensurate with usual cultural practice?

A Difficulties are created by the crowded conditions.

Example: An elderly woman [words deleted] was a cause of considerable

conflict in her shared accomodation as other occupants considered her habits

unclean and blamed her family for this. An application was made to DIMIA

for more suitable accomodation for the family [words deleted] but this was

refused.

In conclusion, I believe that the current policy of mandatory detention

for asylum seekers can only result in continued psychological damage to

the children who are detained. The isolation of the detention centres, the

manner in which they strip autonomy and dignity from inmates, the uncertainty

associated with the visa application process, and the way in which inmates

perceive themselves as unfairly treated, or even persecuted, all serve to

create an atmosphere of helplessness and hopelessness. This in turn frequently

precipitates frank mental illness in an already highly vulnerable population.

Children of parents affected in this way are damaged in a severe and lasting

way by this experience, as described in detail in the Australian Psychological

Society submission.

I have found this a very difficult report to write. Never before in my professional

life have I felt so helpless, so often. I could not give the people in Woomera

Detention Centre what they needed most: their freedom. I felt guilt because

I was part of the society that had inflicted this wrong upon them, and because

it was impossible for me, and my colleagues, to provide them with the level

of care that was their right as human beings.

Terry ZeeherLast

Updated 9 January 2003.